From Mindless to Mindful Decision Making: Reflecting on Prescriptive Processes
نویسندگان
چکیده
Huber, Michaela (Ph.D., Department of Psychology and Neuroscience) From mindless to mindful decision making: Reflecting on prescriptive processes Thesis directed by Leaf Van Boven, Associate Professor, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience People frequently make judgments and decisions in ways that, in hindsight, they might prefer to have made differently. Their judgments and decisions may be strongly influenced by some attributes that people would prefer receive less weight (e.g. transient emotions, peripheral cues, and social influence), and people may neglect other attributes that they would prefer receive more weight (e.g. factual information, subjective experiences, and personal preference). The central claim in this dissertation is that asking people to reflect on prescriptive decision processes—how decisions should be made—elicits a psychological state of mindfulness where people are increasingly aware of and better able to correct decisional influences. Such mindfulness thus improves the subjective quality of decisions. Six experiments examine how introspection-induced mindfulness changes the weighting of decision attributes and the outcome of decisions in various domains including charitable giving (Studies 1 & 5), dating (Studies 2 & 6), policy evaluations (Study 3), and movie preferences (Study 4). In each experiment, people’s decisions are strongly influenced by some attributes while neglecting other attributes, in contrast with people’s beliefs about how decisions
منابع مشابه
Mindful IT Adoption: Making the right strategic decisions by knowing why and how to adopt enterprise systems?
Corporate investment in enterprise level IT systems has been characterised by high rates of failure. The paper presents a knowledge based perspective to examine how firms adopt and implement enterprise systems in order to better understand how organisations can achieve reliable outcomes from such investments. The case presented explores the key decision stages of a major ERP investment, focusin...
متن کاملFrom mindless to mindful practice--cognitive bias and clinical decision making.
n engl j med 368;26 nejm.org june 27, 2013 2445 correct diagnoses as often as we think: the diagnostic failure rate is estimated to be 10 to 15%. The rate is highest among specialties in which patients are diagnostically undifferentiated, such as emergency medicine, family medicine, and internal medicine. Error in the visual specialties, such as radiology and pathology, is considerably lower, p...
متن کاملImproving spatial abilities through mindfulness: effects on the mental rotation task.
In this study, we demonstrate a previously unknown finding that mindful learning can improve an individual's spatial cognition without regard to gender differences. Thirty-two volunteers participated in the experiment. Baselines for spatial ability were first measured for the reaction time on the mental rotation task. Next, the participants were randomly assigned to either a mindful or mindless...
متن کاملState-of-the-Art Prescriptive Criteria Weight Elicitation
Comparatively few of the vast amounts of decision analytical methods suggested have beenwidely spread in actual practice. Some approaches have nevertheless been more successful in this respect than others. Quantitative decision making has moved from the study of decision theory founded on a single criterion towards decision support for more realistic decision-making situations with multiple, of...
متن کاملA Hyperknowledge Environment to Support Strategic Decision-Making
This paper focuses on the design of a computer-based system for supporting executive decision-making, beyond the mere retrieval and processing of data and information. We examine the extent to which, by using the hyperknowledge framework for decision support systems, executive support systems can be made to emulate human perceptual and judgmental processes. Based on an appreciation of the cogni...
متن کامل